Introduction to the Matchup
On September 7, 2024, the Appalachian State Mountaineers faced off against the Clemson Tigers in a highly anticipated college football game at Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South Carolina. The No. 25-ranked Tigers, coming off a disappointing 34-3 loss to Georgia, were eager to rebound against a Mountaineers team known for its upset potential against Power 4 opponents. The game resulted in a decisive 66-20 victory for Clemson, with the Tigers showcasing an explosive offensive performance led by quarterback Cade Klubnik. This article delves into the player statistics from this matchup, highlighting key performances, team dynamics, and statistical breakdowns that defined the game. By examining individual contributions and team metrics, we gain insight into how Clemson dominated and where App State struggled, providing a comprehensive overview of this memorable encounter.
Clemson’s Offensive Dominance
Clemson’s offense was the story of the game, amassing 712 total yards, including 460 passing yards and 252 rushing yards, marking one of the most prolific performances in school history. Quarterback Cade Klubnik was the centerpiece, delivering a historic performance that set the tone early. Klubnik completed 24 of 26 passes for 378 yards and five touchdowns in the first half alone, adding two rushing touchdowns on two carries for a total of seven scores. His 92.3% completion rate, combined with his touchdown production, made him the first FBS player in 25 years to achieve five passing touchdowns, two rushing touchdowns, and a 90% completion rate in a single game, according to ESPN. Klubnik’s touchdown passes included a 76-yard strike to freshman Bryant Wesco Jr., a 41-yard pass to tight end Jake Briningstool, a 29-yard score to Antonio Williams, a 33-yard pass to T.J. Moore, and a 17-yard touchdown to Briningstool. Running back Phil Mafah complemented the passing game with an 83-yard touchdown run, finishing with 118 yards on 10 carries. The Tigers’ offensive line provided ample protection, allowing Klubnik to dissect App State’s secondary with precision. Clemson’s 525 yards in the first half set a program record, and their eight consecutive touchdown drives to open the game underscored their relentless attack.
App State’s Offensive Struggles
In contrast, Appalachian State’s offense struggled to keep pace, managing 363 total yards, with 214 passing and 149 rushing. Quarterback Joey Aguilar, the preseason Sun Belt Conference Player of the Year, completed 18 of 43 passes for 214 yards, throwing one touchdown and one interception. His lone touchdown pass was a 17-yard completion to Makai Jackson in the third quarter. Aguilar faced consistent pressure from Clemson’s defensive front, notably from defensive end T.J. Parker, which disrupted his rhythm. Running back Anderson Castle provided a bright spot, scoring a 4-yard touchdown run in the second quarter, finishing with 65 yards on 12 carries. Maquel Haywood added 52 yards on eight carries, showcasing App State’s ground game potential. However, the Mountaineers converted only 4 of 13 third-down attempts and failed to sustain drives against Clemson’s defense, which forced three turnovers, including a fumble on a kickoff return and an interception by Levi Matthews. App State’s 20 points came from two touchdowns and two field goals by Michael Hughes, including a 35-yard kick at halftime, but their offensive output was overshadowed by Clemson’s relentless scoring.
ALSO READ: Timberwolves vs Lakers Match Player Stats 2025 Playoff Showdown: Player Stats Highlights
Key Receiving Performances
The receiving corps for both teams played significant roles, with Clemson’s pass-catchers thriving in the open field. Bryant Wesco Jr. emerged as a standout for the Tigers, catching three passes for 130 yards, including the 76-yard touchdown that opened the scoring just 34 seconds into the game. His performance tied him with Clemson greats like Artavis Scott for the fewest career games (two) needed to record a 100-yard receiving game. Jake Briningstool was equally impactful, hauling in seven receptions for 100 yards and two touchdowns (41 and 17 yards), earning praise from scouts as noted in a Senior Bowl post on X. Antonio Williams contributed four catches for 78 yards, including a 29-yard touchdown, while T.J. Moore added a 33-yard touchdown reception. For App State, Makai Jackson led with five receptions for 62 yards and a touchdown, but the Mountaineers’ passing game lacked the explosiveness to challenge Clemson’s secondary consistently. The disparity in yards per catch—14.4 for Clemson versus 11.9 for App State—highlighted the Tigers’ ability to generate big plays through the air.
Defensive Contributions and Turnovers
Clemson’s defense, while allowing 363 yards, made critical plays to stifle App State’s momentum. True freshman Sammy Brown led the Tigers with nine tackles, showcasing his potential as a future star. Stephiylan Green recorded the team’s only sack, a pivotal third-down stop in the third quarter, while Ricardo Jones sealed a goal-line stand with an interception at the 1-yard line. Peter Nearn’s fumble recovery on a kickoff return set up a 36-yard field goal by Nolan Hauser, further extending Clemson’s lead. The Tigers’ three forced turnovers were instrumental in maintaining control, especially after App State showed signs of life with their second-quarter touchdown. On the App State side, linebacker Nate Johnson, a South Carolina native, recorded seven tackles, including one for loss, but the Mountaineers’ defense struggled to contain Clemson’s multifaceted attack. Safety Jordan Favors added six tackles, but App State’s 30.8% third-down conversion defense rate (6 of 12 allowed) and inability to force turnovers allowed Clemson to dictate the game’s tempo.
Special Teams and Game Management
Special teams played a secondary but notable role in the game’s outcome. Clemson’s Nolan Hauser converted a 36-yard field goal, though he hit the upright, marking his second successful attempt of his career. Antonio Williams’ 25-yard punt return set up a short field for Clemson’s sixth touchdown, highlighting their ability to win the field position battle. App State’s Michael Hughes was perfect on his two field goal attempts, including a 35-yard kick at halftime, but a fumbled kickoff return by the Mountaineers gifted Clemson prime field position. Both teams managed the clock similarly, with App State holding the ball for 31:33 compared to Clemson’s 28:27, but the Tigers’ efficiency—averaging 9.8 yards per play versus App State’s 5.2—rendered time of possession less relevant. Clemson’s 15 drives matched App State’s, but their ability to score on 10 of them, including eight touchdowns and a field goal, underscored their dominance.
Statistical Breakdown and Team Comparison
A deeper look at the team stats reveals the chasm between the two programs on this night. Clemson’s 712 total yards ranked sixth in school history, with their 460 passing yards also sixth all-time. Their 66 points tied for the 14th-most in a single game for the program, and their 35 first-quarter points set a school record. The Tigers converted 50% of their third-down attempts (6 of 12) and went 1 for 3 on fourth downs, reflecting their aggressive play-calling. App State, meanwhile, averaged 5.2 yards per play, with 214 passing yards and 149 rushing yards. Their 30.8% third-down conversion rate and 0 for 0 on fourth downs highlighted their inability to sustain drives. Clemson’s 73 plays compared to App State’s 70 showed similar offensive opportunities, but the Tigers’ explosive plays—five touchdown passes of 17+ yards and an 83-yard run—made the difference. The Mountaineers’ 24 first downs were respectable, but their four penalties for 35 yards and three turnovers hindered their chances.
Contextualizing the Performance
Clemson’s performance must be viewed in the context of their Week 1 loss to Georgia, where their offense managed just 188 yards and three points. The Tigers’ 66-20 rout of App State was a statement, silencing critics who questioned coach Dabo Swinney’s offensive scheme and Klubnik’s development. The game showcased Clemson’s depth, with backup quarterback Christopher Vizzina leading a seven-play, 61-yard touchdown drive in the third quarter, scoring on a five-yard run. For App State, the loss was a reminder of the challenge of facing an elite Power 4 team on the road, despite their reputation for upsets, such as their 2007 stunner against Michigan. The Mountaineers’ 1-1 record after the game reflected their competitiveness, but their 18.4% win probability in simulations, as predicted by SI.com, proved accurate. Clemson’s 6-0 all-time record against App State, including a 41-10 win in 2015, reinforced their historical dominance in the series.
Impact on Players and Future Outlook
For Clemson, Cade Klubnik’s breakout game solidified his status as a potential NFL prospect, with his 378 yards and seven touchdowns earning national attention. Bryant Wesco Jr. and Jake Briningstool emerged as reliable targets, while Phil Mafah’s 118 rushing yards bolstered the ground game. Defensively, Sammy Brown’s nine tackles and Ricardo Jones’ interception highlighted the Tigers’ young talent. App State’s Joey Aguilar, despite a subpar 18-for-43 passing performance, remains a key leader for the Mountaineers, with his 2023 single-season total offense record as evidence of his capability. Anderson Castle and Makai Jackson showed promise, but App State’s defense, led by Nate Johnson, will need to regroup to compete in Sun Belt play. Clemson’s bye week following the game allowed them to prepare for NC State on September 21, while App State faced upcoming games against Georgia State and Old Dominion, aiming to build on their 6.9 projected wins for the season.
Conclusion
The September 7, 2024, clash between App State and Clemson was a showcase of offensive firepower for the Tigers, driven by Cade Klubnik’s historic performance, and a learning opportunity for the Mountaineers. Clemson’s 712 yards, 66 points, and 10 scoring drives overwhelmed App State’s defense, while the Mountaineers’ 363 yards and 20 points reflected their resilience despite the lopsided score. Key performers like Klubnik, Wesco, Briningstool, and Mafah for Clemson, and Aguilar, Castle, and Jackson for App State, defined the game’s narrative. The statistical disparities—9.8 yards per play for Clemson versus 5.2 for App State, and three turnovers forced by the Tigers—underscored the gap in execution. This game not only highlighted Clemson’s ability to rebound from adversity but also reinforced App State’s challenge in upsetting a Power 4 giant. As both teams move forward, the player stats from this matchup will serve as a benchmark for their respective seasons, with Clemson eyeing ACC contention and App State aiming for Sun Belt success.
