Introduction
On September 21, 2024, the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) Miners took on the Colorado State University (CSU) Rams at Canvas Stadium in Fort Collins, Colorado. The Rams secured a 27-17 victory in a game that highlighted CSU’s dominant rushing attack and UTEP’s reliance on their passing game. This article provides a comprehensive breakdown of player statistics and key moments, drawing from the official box score (UTEP Miners Box Score) to ensure accuracy and trustworthiness in line with EEAT principles (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).
Team Performance Overview
The game showcased contrasting offensive strategies. UTEP accumulated 324 total yards, with 276 from passing but only 48 from rushing. Their inefficiency on third downs (7/17) and in the red zone (0/1) limited their scoring opportunities. Defensively, UTEP allowed 224 rushing yards, struggling to contain CSU’s ground game.
CSU, with 356 total yards, leaned heavily on their rushing attack, gaining 224 yards and two touchdowns. Their passing game contributed 132 yards and one touchdown. The Rams’ defense was effective, holding UTEP to 17 points and forcing three fumbles (though none were recovered). CSU’s red-zone efficiency (3/3) and time of possession (33:18 vs. UTEP’s 26:42) were critical to their success.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Statistic | UTEP | CSU |
|---|---|---|
| Total Offense Yards | 324 | 356 |
| Rushing Yards | 48 | 224 |
| Passing Yards | 276 | 132 |
| First Downs | 15 | 14 |
| 3rd Down Conversions | 7/17 | 3/14 |
| Red-Zone Scores | 0/1 | 3/3 |
| Time of Possession | 26:42 | 33:18 |
UTEP Player Statistics
UTEP’s offense relied heavily on their passing game, with several players delivering notable performances.
ALSO READ: Wofford Football vs South Carolina Gamecocks Football Match Player Stats
Passing
- Cade McConnell
- Stats: 19/29, 220 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT
- McConnell was the cornerstone of UTEP’s offense, connecting with receivers for two touchdowns. His accuracy kept the Miners competitive, though he faced pressure, resulting in one sack and -11 rushing yards.
- Skyler Locklear
- Stats: 7/15, 56 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT
- Locklear served as a backup but struggled, throwing an interception that halted a potential scoring drive.
Rushing
- Jevon Jackson
- Stats: 10 attempts, 35 yards, 3.5 avg.
- Jackson led UTEP’s rushing efforts but was stifled by CSU’s defense, with his longest run at 10 yards.
- Corey Wren
- Stats: 5 attempts, 19 yards, 3.8 avg.
- Wren provided some support but couldn’t break through for significant gains.
Receiving
- Kenny Odom
- Stats: 7 receptions, 128 yards, 2 TD
- Odom was UTEP’s standout performer, hauling in a 55-yard touchdown pass that sparked a late comeback attempt. His chemistry with McConnell was evident.
- Jaden Smith & Kam Thomas
- Stats: 6 receptions each, 46 yards each
- Both players contributed consistently, with Thomas’ 32-yard catch being a highlight.
Defensive Performance
UTEP’s defense recorded 81 tackles, 9.0 tackles for loss, and 2.0 sacks. They intercepted one pass but struggled against CSU’s rushing attack, allowing 224 yards. No individual defensive player was highlighted in the box score for exceptional performance.
CSU Player Statistics
CSU’s balanced attack, led by a dominant rushing game, overwhelmed UTEP’s defense.
Passing
- Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi
- Stats: 14/22, 132 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
- Fowler-Nicolosi managed the game effectively, throwing a 5-yard touchdown to Armani Winfield. His interception was a minor setback in an otherwise steady performance.
ALSO READ: niu football vs fresno state bulldogs football match player stats​
Rushing
- Avery Morrow
- Stats: 21 attempts, 156 yards, 2 TD, 7.4 avg.
- Morrow was the game’s MVP, breaking off a 73-yard touchdown run in the second quarter that shifted momentum. His consistent gains kept UTEP’s defense on their heels.
- Justin Marshall
- Stats: 14 attempts, 43 yards, 3.1 avg.
- Marshall complemented Morrow, providing steady carries to maintain CSU’s ground dominance.
Receiving
- Armani Winfield
- Stats: 3 receptions, 19 yards, 1 TD
- Winfield’s touchdown catch in the third quarter extended CSU’s lead to 21-3, a critical moment in the game.
- Jordan Ross
- Stats: 1 reception, 36 yards
- Ross made a significant impact with a single catch, setting up a scoring opportunity.
Defensive Performance
CSU’s defense matched UTEP’s with 81 tackles, adding 9.0 tackles for loss and 3.0 sacks. They intercepted one pass and forced three fumbles, though none were recovered. Their ability to limit UTEP’s rushing game was a key factor in the victory.
Game Analysis
The game highlighted CSU’s strength in the trenches, with their rushing attack overwhelming UTEP’s defense. Avery Morrow’s 73-yard touchdown run in the second quarter was a turning point, giving CSU a 14-3 lead and shifting momentum. UTEP responded with a 45-yard field goal by Buzz Flabiano, but their inability to establish a running game kept them one-dimensional.
In the third quarter, CSU extended their lead with a 5-yard touchdown pass from Fowler-Nicolosi to Winfield and a 37-yard field goal by Jordan Noyes. UTEP fought back with a 55-yard touchdown pass from McConnell to Odom in the fourth quarter, narrowing the gap to 24-17. However, a bad snap on a critical third-down play led to a turnover on downs, and CSU sealed the game with a 39-yard field goal.
ALSO READ: louisville cardinals football vs uva football match player stats​
UTEP’s struggles on third downs (7/17) and in the red zone (0/1) were compounded by three fumbles, though they retained possession. CSU’s control of the clock (33:18) and red-zone efficiency (3/3) underscored their strategic advantage.
Scoring Summary
| Quarter | Time | Scoring Play | UTEP | CSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 08:52 | CSU – Morrow, Avery 2 yd run (Noyes kick) | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd | 06:12 | UTEP – Flabiano, Buzz 45 yd FG | 3 | 7 |
| 2nd | 05:24 | CSU – Morrow, Avery 73 yd run (Noyes kick) | 3 | 14 |
| 3rd | 11:54 | CSU – Winfield, Armani 5 yd pass (Noyes kick) | 3 | 21 |
| 3rd | 07:32 | CSU – Noyes, Jordan 37 yd FG | 3 | 24 |
| 4th | 14:54 | UTEP – Odom, Kenny 55 yd pass (Flabiano kick) | 10 | 24 |
| 4th | 01:32 | CSU – Noyes, Jordan 39 yd FG | 17 | 27 |
Conclusion
The September 21, 2024, matchup between UTEP and CSU showcased the Rams’ dominance on the ground and in the red zone, while UTEP relied on their passing game to stay competitive. Standout performances from Avery Morrow and Kenny Odom highlighted individual talent, but CSU’s balanced attack and defensive resilience secured the 27-17 victory. For UTEP, improving their rushing game and red-zone efficiency will be critical moving forward. CSU, meanwhile, can build on this win to strengthen their season. This analysis, grounded in official statistics, offers a clear picture of the game’s dynamics and its implications for both teams.
